I'm really surprised about the comment that Viewscan is less suitable for batch scanning than SilverFast. If anything, I think that it is quicker to use ViewScan for volume scanning, though its image manipulation capabilities are less user friendly than ScanFast (is that what was meant be its being more of a front-end for PS?). Support for ViewScan is excellent (I've been getting free upgrades for 3 years now) and the last few releases have seen more and more features added in... such as the incredibly useful gamut/clipping feature in the latest release (7.6.1)
and no. I don't work for them! Also does anyone else find SilverFast has a tendency to crash? Particularly when called as a PS plugin on Windows? Paul Freeman www.architecturalimages.co.uk -- ____________________________________________________ Message scanned for viruses and dangerous content by <http://www.newnet.co.uk/av/> and believed to be clean =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
