on 15/01/03 14:01, michael shaffer wrote : > Neil :o) > > As you are probably aware, we are making an effort to keep our > subscribers' e-mail addresses from being harvested by bots (off the public > domain archive). Rather than quote someone elses', you have chosen to > include your own e-mail, which I believe is your perogative, but we can at > least argue it is bad practice, and a bad example, in the context of this > being sent to our archive. I have changed my signature to a Prodig signature and I have tried to avoid using or replying with any e-mails in these replies. > We realize this requires extra diligence on your part, and the last thing > we want to do is discourage your knowledgable responses ... however, you are > putting us between a rock and a hard place ... do we discontinue the > archive, or do we reduce the exposures by un-subscribing??? > > thanx for being a responsible Prodig subscriber ... > http://www.prodig.org/guide.html > cheerios ... michael shaffer :o) > Prodig list mum
Listen, if sometimes it slips that the e-mail is in messages, then that's just too bad. If you don't like it just unsubscribe me. Some of what I see on this list is so irrelevant, and if an e-mail address is so important then I don't see any need to continue to frequent this list. Do what you want. -- Neil Snape http://mapage.noos.fr/nsnape =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
