on 15/01/2003 3:07 pm, neil snape: > on 15/01/03 14:01, michael shaffer wrote : > >> Neil :o) >> >> As you are probably aware, we are making an effort to keep our >> subscribers' e-mail addresses from being harvested by bots (off the public >> domain archive). Rather than quote someone elses', you have chosen to >> include your own e-mail, which I believe is your perogative, but we can at >> least argue it is bad practice, and a bad example, in the context of this >> being sent to our archive. > I have changed my signature to a Prodig signature and I have tried to avoid > using or replying with any e-mails in these replies. >> We realize this requires extra diligence on your part, and the last thing >> we want to do is discourage your knowledgable responses ... however, you are >> putting us between a rock and a hard place ... do we discontinue the >> archive, or do we reduce the exposures by un-subscribing??? >> >> thanx for being a responsible Prodig subscriber ... >> http://www.prodig.org/guide.html >> cheerios ... michael shaffer :o) >> Prodig list mum > > Listen, if sometimes it slips that the e-mail is in messages, then that's > just too bad. If you don't like it just unsubscribe me. Some of what I see > on this list is so irrelevant, and if an e-mail address is so important > then I don't see any need to continue to frequent this list. Do what you > want.
Jeez Neil which side of the bed did you get out of. I have just received a similar mail from list mom but kept my reply off the forum and it was certainly less terse than yours. Life's a bit short don't you think for a lack of politeness to our fellows, no matter what. Sam Moxon =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
