Hi Nico, As i hadn't named the library and as you are a magazine and as i don't know yourselves, i'm sure you understand i wasn't talking about yourselves. I do apologise is there was any confusion.
Cheers, slater ps did you check out the link which, to my eyes, showed that a 31Mb digital camera file was superior to a 338Mb flextight scan? http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/shootout.shtml > From: Niko Tom� > Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 14:36:43 +0100 > > On 28.1.2003 2:13 PM, "Slater King" wrote: > >> it seemed to me was filled with complete anti-digital fundamentalist >> @&$&�&'s as, for example, i was told that a file from a 6 mega pixl camera >> could not be enlarged any bigger than A5 (post card size). > > > Dear Slater, > > We are NOT anti-digital fundamentalist. We are just sick of getting digital > images from digital cameras. They are just NOT as good as a good scan. Not > yet! Wait for another year or two. Of course, in depends on the kind of > image you are after. I work for a very high quality magazine, and we are > scanning with a flatbeb Heidelberg F4100. Quality is incredible. We will > only accept incredible quality. And digital cameras are not there yet. We > are not fundamentalists, we've got a eye. > > To all of you: STOP buying digital cameras. Just be patience!! > > > Niko =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
