Niko Tom� wrote:
> On 28.1.2003 2:13 PM, "Slater King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > it seemed to me was filled with complete anti-digital fundamentalist > > @&$&�&'s as, for example, i was told that a file from a 6 mega pixl camera > > could not be enlarged any bigger than A5 (post card size). > > Dear Slater, > > We are NOT anti-digital fundamentalist. We are just sick of getting digital > images from digital cameras. They are just NOT as good as a good scan. Not > yet! Wait for another year or two. Of course, in depends on the kind of > image you are after. I work for a very high quality magazine, and we are > scanning with a flatbeb Heidelberg F4100. Quality is incredible. We will > only accept incredible quality. And digital cameras are not there yet. We > are not fundamentalists, we've got a eye. > > To all of you: STOP buying digital cameras. Just be patience!! > > Niko Ha! it depends on the operator, not the digital camera. I can produce an image that you will not be able to tell came from a digital camera! The human eye can only discern about 600 dpi max so what's the need for chemical development? Your in a minority and hurting yourself without considering digital technology. It's fast and totally controllable. Soon it will totally surpass anything chemical can produce, just as Big Blue will beat any chess player in the world! Regards, -Donald =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
