In a message dated 2/1/03 5:04:36 AM, schewe writes: <<
Side by side, exact same lens & crop. Digital processed through an un-named beta of a soon to be announced raw image conversion (in 6 seconds from preview on a 1gig Ti Laptop using OS X) and up-rezed in stages to the same size as the 35mm chrome scanned on an Imacon 848 at 6700ppi. (film was EPP) Result? Film sucks. . .badly! >> Dear Jeff Does this imply that the Imacon scanner is the very best for scanning film? I have always thought that the drum scanners at ten times the price produced a better scan. Richard Kenward has just sold his Imacon in favour of two unnamed drum scanners. He must be seeing a difference. Bob Croxford =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
