On 26/7/03 8:39 am, "Nildram" wrote: > Hello Group, > I've started working with an art director, very experienced and an old hand, > though it's been about 15 years since we last worked together. He's very > reluctant to use disc images, citing problems with printers on previous jobs > (mainly books and magazines). He's really keen that I submit film, or even > an excellent inkjet print (not simply as reference but to scan from - a > roundabout way I can't understand), and feels that you will always get a > better result this way. Is there a difference, if both scans are of a high > quality, between (a) submitting a scan; or (b) letting the repro house > generate it's own scan. Also, what are your thoughts on using an inkjet > print as the source print to scan from?
Have you ever tried to scan an inkjet print? Try it. If he wants a print, he should be using a Fuji Pictograph or a Polie Print. Which are indistinguishable from an RA4 print made from a neg. And will scan just as well. Regards Paul -- Paul Tansley Fashion & Beauty Photography London +44 (0) 7973 669584 http://www.paultansley.com =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
