> There are a very few contributors to this forum who admit to owning and > using serious professional digital equipment (with movements) for serious > work for serious clients, who would have previously insisted on LF: is this > the sort of professional digital photography in which you are interested?
As the person who asked the particular question of relevance of organisations, I'm hoping that that I don't have to wander around with some huge cumbersome bit of kit, just to regarded as 'serious' :-)) As to LF forums, why not set up your own Yahoo group - you can make it as moderated and selective in its membership as you like - or suggest a new forum for dpreview? My question was concerned with relevancy to the business of earning a living from photography, irrespective of what technology it is carried out with. I'm getting the impression from the responses that there are organisations that will be of use if you or your clients value letters after your name, but that for the digital side of things there ain't much more? Am I getting the wrong impression here? bye for now Keith Cooper =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
