Michael,

The extra 20% does make a difference to us.

As a portrait studios we regularly generate image sizes that approach 1Gb
before saving (loads of layers!!).

For a long time, I had my slider set to 75% but was slowed down all the time
as as the file sizes exceeded the available RAM and data was being written
to the scratch disk.

Also, when preparing images for viewing we like to bring up as many as
possible at a time to speed the workflow. During this process we 'fill up'
the available RAM (checking the position on the status bar) and have never
had a problem.

Just a thought for those alarmed at the idea of using 100%. If this would
render Photoshop unstable, then surely Adobe would not leave it as an
option. Or perhaps 100% is not really 100% of all the system RAM but simply
100% of what is available AFTER system needs have been catered for?

Even when set at this level, I am successfully running my file browser and
the RIP in the background.

Jonathan

"I don't know that 100% is advisable.  Are you saying you saw
significant loss of performance for any other allocation
setting?  For example, what's your experience for an
allocation of 80%??  And, how much RAM  are you speaking of, and how big of
an image file?

cheerios ... shAf  :o)
Avalon Peninsula, Newfoundland"

===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE

Reply via email to