Jonathan Keenan wrote:-

>How much pro stuff is shot on MF/5x4 digital backs simply to convince 
>the client it's worth all that money and to polish the photographers 
>ego?

A very seductive argument that willl appeal to all owners of 35mm bodied 
digital cameras.

Back in the real world however ...... it's all a matter of sophistication 
, expectation and the harsh realities of high end advertising.

If one has clients that can't tell the difference between files from a 
prosumer camera and those from the likes of Sinar , Lightphase , Imacon 
etc, then it's more than likely that those clients have the sort of 
budgets that reflect this myopia. However if one is fortunate enough to 
have clients who can't tell the difference but still have huge budgets , 
then surely it's still  down to the truly professional photographer to 
give them the best quality available when the budget allows ?

If, as a photographer ,one can't tell the difference betwen the files 
from a prosumer camera and a high end back , then I would seriously doubt 
that photographers analytical faculties when it comes to supplying 
digital images.

When it comes to the question of ego , then we are in danger of also 
getting embroiled in camera envy...." it's not the size that matters , 
it's what you do with it ". 

Now ( when it comes to cameras that is :-) ) , this is an argument that 
can hold some sway. I've always been an advocate of imagery first , 
technology second . Some of my own favourite images were shot on a 10x8 
camera with a piece of cardboard with a small slot in it instead of a 
lens ( 45 minute exposure ). 

But , and its a big but , the act remains that some camera systems are 
just not up to the tasks demanded of them by some commissions , and one 
would be seriously deluded to think otherwise.

BTW much as I'm sure us smudgers  love to give our brilliantly , some 
might say blindingly glossy egos another buffing , personally I'm still 
saving for the boat , so a few dull patches are to be expected . And when 
it comes to convincing clients it's worth all the money , I'm afraid it's 
no longer the Eighties. Reality rules.

Bottom line is that buying into high end systems is a commercial 
decision. If you already have the client list and the technical savvy , 
and the energy 
to keep the systems working , then it can be profitable  . Just investing 
the dosh into such systems isn't going to make you either wealthy or a 
better smudger overnight. And if you can't tell the difference between 
prosumer and high end , it's very likely to make you a whole load poorer.

Regards ,

Bob Marchant.








===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE

Reply via email to