On: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 Giles Stokoe wrote:- > William was almost there with > >> the depth of field will be more than adequate. > > But a more precise answer would help me decide to part with the cash.
May I repeat, the depth of field will be more than adequate, which is precisely what you need. > It is basically a purely practical yes/no question and I could set up a rig > to test it if I had a digi, but I don't. I could also find out if I had some > kind of table of fields of view for lenses of different focal length at > different apertures. Which I don't either. Do a web search, and you will find both in abundance. > Or do the abberations means that one cannot actually use an aperture small > enough to achieve the depth of field achieved on the 35mm, because the image > would appear out of focus due to diffraction etc? Buy yourself a decent digicam, and you will be happily surprised at how good they are....focus and diffraction are different properties and you simply don't really need to know this stuff....just buy a camera and get on with it. William Curwen http://www.william.ws =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
