on 10/3/04 10:04 pm, i4images wrote: > http://www.dpreview.com/gallery/?gallery=kodakdcsslrn_preview/ > > Tests look bloody good, better than those on the kodak site at 100%. > IMHO (ok not as interesting) But look at the sky, lookin good.
Ian Got to agree the files look good. What is more interesting is doing a comparison with the review files for the 1Ds. The sky is smoother with much less noise. Other qualities are perhaps harder to compare as the Kodak file is over 1MB smaller than the 1Ds file. Which could suggest a higher amount of jpeg artifacts. Although I don't know for sure what settigs were used. Not a complaint to you, but the shots were posted on 12th February as part of the PMA relese story. The camera was described as "an early SLR/n" which sounds as though it is a production sample not a preproduction model. The strength of these files and others online and after tests with the 14n convinced me to put my name down for one. So roll on "late March early April" :) Ian -- Ian Goodrick, Tel/Fax +44 (0) 1474 333066 Ian Goodrick Photography, Mobile 07860 362322 Gravesend, Kent, UK www.goodrick-photo.com =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
