>Dear list, > >Thinking of jumping ship to canon and getting a 1d2 as it will serve my >needs better. I have heard of some not happy with soft images. This >seems to have been well documented in reviews, but that the images were >not unsharp, just that they were soft due to the strong antialiasing >filter. There doesn't seem much in image quality between it and the 1ds >or the kodak, and the low is noise is supposed to be phenominal, best in >its class and above in slrs. > >Your experiences please. > >cheers > >Ian Reynolds > >
Mine can't focus accurately using AI-Servo even after going back to Canon to have the body and lens calibrated.Not happy!! http://homepage.mac.com/phsp/FileSharing141.html for some bad examples,seeing as Canon have not bothered to ring me back. On the plus side another photographer has supplied me a sequence of sharp images which would not require a lot of post processing .The colours are excellent and working round the soft images is not a major hurdle.Don't expect "jpeg's to go" without adjusting the parameters for contrast and sharpness. Why did Kodak allow Nikon and Canon to produce there own digitals.Everything was easy with the DCS520. Phill Heywood =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
