Hi Paul, I think I misunderstood your first reply, to quote your new message:
"it's only good enough if it IS perfect :-)" I could not agree more. After looking at the images on your web site, I REALLY understand your statement. For those on the list who have not looked at Paul's website, it is well worth the trip. What a great place to live, bet you don't miss the hectic life in London. Best, John http://www.johndouglasphotography.com http://johndouglasphotography.blogspot.com/ > Yes, sorry John, I did realize I was taking your 'good enough' comment > out of context, and should have said so. I was using your post to just > pass a little personal comment of mine about the 'good enough' concept. > > As an ex London still life photographer I routinely used to be at the > studio at 9 in the evening, giving some undeserving swine 110% when 105% > would have done. My point is that, actually, 100% is enough. > > I think working digitally has shown some of this wrong thinking for what > it is; I've found that, with digital, if it's good enough, it's perfect. > And, just in case I'm misunderstood, it's only good enough if it IS > perfect :-) > > > -- > Best wishes > > Paul Bradforth > > http://www.paulbradforth.com > > =============================================================== > GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE > =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
