Previously Martijn Pieters wrote: > On 9/22/07, Radim Novotny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * at-integration-branch - started by gawel and recently mj did some > > changes. Branch seems interesting, because rewrites CMF based > > PloneGazette to AT based types. I'v never tried this branch yet. Anyone > > using it and knows status? > > Yes, I made some initial fixes, but I abandonded the branch, it wasn't > in a usable state. We created the attopic branch instead. > > > * attopic - active branch (PloneSolutions?). Uses ATTopic instead of > > PG/Topic. > > This is what we did next, as using an ATTopic was the most important > requirement we had at the time. We'd be fine with merging this with > the trunk.
Indeed. That branch also keeps support in place for existing newsletters which have CMF-based topics while using ATTopic for all new content, making it a safe upgrade. > > So, if you are interested in PloneGazette, please vote :) > > > > Should I commit merged version into trunk? > > +1 +1 > > Should I create another branch ? (review branch) > > Be bold, make it the trunk. Moving it to a branch can always be done still. There are already too many branches! Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. _______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/product-developers
