You didn't seem to mind quoting these numbers when The Great Stainmaker was in office.
--- Hal Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Who calculates these numbers? Who audits them? How do we know they are > not Enron'ed? > > I am serious about this. There is a lot of talk about strong economy > and assorted positive aspects, but tell the truth, have you experienced > them? > > I mean like unemployment is down (or so they say). Are they counting > the people who have used up all their benefits and can no longer file a > claim? Or did those people magically become "employed" because they are > not claiming unemployment benefits? > > You guys and gals are smart, how 'bout 'splainin' dat to me, Lucy? > > HALinNY > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Michael Madigan > Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 02:05 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OT] Bush ahead of schedule to halve the deficit by 2009 > > Once again, the critics are wrong. > > http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZTVmMDgzOGU5NWViZjdjNTIwMmNhMDhlYjM > 4MzEwNDk= > > > > > **** New Lower Prices ***** > Horse Racing Photos at http://michaelmadigan.exposuremanager.com/ > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
