-----Opprinnelig melding----- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av Dominic Burford
<And there is likely to be more time available for testing due to the quicker development times that weakly types languages are capable of. > I would say that this is highly dependant on the type of application that you are making. I have worked with both weakly and strongly typed languages, and I must say that for large projects involving multiple developers and changing requirements, strong, static typing speeds things up, simply because refactoring is so much easier to do. Furthermore, IMO, static (as opposed to just strong) typing is very valuable for intellisense, which is able to provide a lot more info in than in a language with weak/dynamic typing, and this alone can speed up development considerably. Eyvind _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
