I remember Senator Lieberman best as one of the 7 Democratic centrist, who joined with 7 Republican centrist, to prevent Senator Frist from abolishing the filibuster, which would have allow president Bush to more easily pack the court with Judges who were less than qualified for the Supreme Court, like his own personal councel, Harriet Miers, for Chirt's sake. LOL. I respect Senator Lieberman for his stand to protect the Senate filibuster, but now Senator Lieberman should throw his support behind Ned Lamont who won the Democratic primary. Instead, Senator Lieberman is planning on running as an independent. This could split the Democratic vote and allow a Neo-Conservative Bush Republican to win the Senate seat.

#---------------------------------
Lieberman concedes to Antiwar Challenger

Three-Term Senator Plans to Run in General election as an Independent

By Dan Balz and William Branigin <http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/dan+balz+and+william+branigin/>
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, August 8, 2006; 11:30 PM

HARTFORD, Conn., Aug . 8 -- In a stunning repudiation, Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman <http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/l000304/> (D-Conn.) lost the Democratic Senate primary here Tuesday night, falling to antiwar candidate Ned Lamont in a campaign that became a referendum on the incumbent's support for the Iraq war and what opponents charged was his failure to challenge President Bush's war policies.

Lieberman conceded the race to Lamont late Tuesday, but vowed to run in the general election in November as an independent.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/08/AR2006080800596.html?referrer=email

or

http://tinyurl.com/sx66l

#--------------------------------------

Regards,

LelandJ



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to