I saw a reference to "Sermon on the Mound" when googling for the
scripture, and was wondering about that. Anyway, I don't know of
anywhere in the Bible where unintended spelling errors are unforgivable
sin, or even a sin for that matter.
Regards,
LelandJ
Michael Madigan wrote:
Sermon on the mound, huh ? LOL
--- Leland Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the great spirit, the creator of all life,
and the creator of
the universe, will forgive me for my unintended
spelling/typing errors,
if that is a sin, but I suppose forgiveness for
spelling errors is
asking a little to much from you. LOL.
#------------------------
Scripture cautions us not to be harsh and judgmental
of others' faults,
even where they are evident, because neither are we
perfect and free
from error. The admonition not to regard the speck
in your neighbor's
eye before removing the log from your own eye finds
parallels in many
scriptures. Rather than justify ourselves and blame
others, we should
look into ourselves for having such feelings of
resentment. We should
look into ourselves for where we may have been at
fault, and from that
starting point we can sincerely strive for
reconciliation.
#------------------------
From Christ's sermon on the mound:
Judge not, that you be not judged. For with the
judgment that you pronounce you will be judged, and
the measure you give will be the measure you
get. Why do you see the speck that is in your
brother's eye, but do not
notice the log that is in your own eye? Or how can
you say to your
brother, "Let me take the speck out of your eye,"
when there is the log in
your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out
of your own eye, and
then you will see clearly to take the speck out of
your brother's eye.
#-----------------------------------------------
Regards,
LelandJ
petetheisen wrote:
Leland Jackson wrote:
You're even out of step with your own folks on
this one. It was the
Radical Religious Right who were up in arms over
this ridiculous
choice to the Supreme Court. Harriet Miers was a
very good
corporate, contract attorney, but had no
qualifications or experience
what-so-ever in the area of Constitutional Law.
Her main
qualifications, that made her an appealing
nomination to the Bush
Administration, was her "Born again Christian"
credentials, coupled
with a close relationship with George W. Bush as
his personal
counsel. LOL
Hi Leland!
Chirt is *still* going to get you, for misspelling
His name!
*Christ* is one name you dare not misspell, $8
spell checker or
otherwise.
Regards,
Pete
Leland Jackson wrote:
I remember Senator Lieberman best as one of the
7 Democratic
centrist, who joined with 7 Republican
centrist, to prevent
Senator Frist from abolishing the filibuster,
which would have
allow president Bush to more easily pack the
court with Judges
who were less than qualified for the Supreme
Court, like his own
personal councel, Harriet Miers, for Chirt's
sake.
<snip>
Chirt is going to get you. I think Harriet Miers
would be a
wonderful supreme court justice.
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
