On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Dan Covill <[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't think this has anything to do with open standards.  MS is just
> abandoning yet another losing effort to create/steamroller/enforce a
> proprietary 'standard' of their own devising.
>
> This one didn't work.  MS Word did.

+1

I've been using ODBC and the FreeTDS drivers to access SQL Server from
Linux and BSD platforms. It's a PITA. Still lots of compatibility
issues, especially when you try to agree on Unicode, code pages,
collation, etc. It's a far from open platform.

My suspicion is that they're endorsing ODBC (note, a well-defined,
cross-platform API) because they can't get their proprietary
object-bound APIs to work on their own platforms, perhaps Windows
Phone or the non-Intel Windows tablets....

-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4tF271pa6e2AkBtbYmHkvhA9=-kaegwjvuvtmo98ru...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to