Dan Covill wrote: > On 12/16/11 21:15, Pete Theisen wrote: >> God is Who >> He Is and religion is what men do in response to their idea of God. > > Nice distinction. I like it. > >> There is some difference, but we don't know what the difference is. > > Disagree. There is a LOT of difference. The first part of the > statement "God is Who He Is" equates to "God is incomprehensible to the > mind of man". Personally, I don't believe a God exists, but I don't > have, and cannot have, any evidence either way. That's what > 'incomprehensible' means. But when men, as part of whatever religion > they have invented, tell us that they know what God wants or doesn't > want, they are ALWAYS, and by definition, full of shit.
Hi Dan, Well, full of shit after Monsignor Georges Henri Joseph Édouard Lemaître, who was a cleric and a scientist. Other clerics are philosophers. They are either full of shit or they are correct in their theories. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lema%C3%AEtre http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy Or they are right every now and then and full of shit the rest of the time. Problem is, the lesser lights won't treat it as theory - they treat the part of it they like as fact and base all sorts of guilt trips for everyone else on it. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
