On 3/22/12 11:18 AM, Stephen Russell wrote: >> I don't understand why companies keep paying $$$ for MS-SQL and Oracle when >> they can >> > pay $0 for postgresql for an enterprise-class database backend that >> > nobody can ever >> > take away from them or demand payment for. > ------------------------- > > Just because it is free to install doesn't mean it is cheap to convert > not only hundreds of gigs of data and the supporting index schema from > one db to another. In our ERP system there are 27,385 tables alone. > All code is done via java and the SPROCS in the existing db are for > our maintenance. Allows cross platform/db environments. > > It takes a while to be able to pinpoint issues with a db and how to > fix them. To suddenly change that and have to get GOOD with the new > one is asking a lot from the team who has to work with it. > > In years of TSQL I have a lot of code that could not run on anything > but TSQL. Just like my friends over at IP and how them work with > Oracle.
Understood for legacy stuff, but new projects? Paul _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
