On 10/29/2012 11:55 AM, Michael Oke wrote:
It's not clearly part of the article when you are reading it on your phone. I 
had already looked up the answer but it doesn't matter what Lincoln' party is 
in comparison to today as that has no relevance. I wondered about recent 
history and found just what I expected. That is another worthless endorsement 
that is meaningless.

The article had a lot of worth and meaning for me. LOL BTW, I should have said _abolition of slavery_, (eg doing away with something by law).

Regards,

LelandJ



Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221

Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.

On Oct 29, 2012, at 9:50, lelandj <[email protected]> wrote:

The question you asked is clearly part of the article, so it seems the question you asked 
was making a point and requiring no answer.  LOL  Look just under the Picture of Abraham 
Lincoln, and click on the caption, "New York Times Endorsements Through the 
Ages".  This link will take you all the way back to the NY Times first endorsement 
of Abraham Lincoln in 1860.

The Republican party of Abraham Lincoln is the Democratic party of today, ( eg 
the abolism of slavery was a very progressive idea in Lincoln's day).


Regards,

LelandJ



On 10/29/2012 10:24 AM, Michael Oke wrote:
No, it's an honest question but you may not know.


Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221

Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.

On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:23, lelandj <[email protected]> wrote:

That's a rhetorical question. LOL  Time for Tia Chi.  Be back soon.

Regards,

LelandJ



On 10/29/2012 10:16 AM, Michael Oke wrote:
Who has the NYTimes endorsed over the last 20 years?


Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221

Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.

On Oct 29, 2012, at 6:32, lelandj <[email protected]> wrote:

The link below is to a good article why the NY Times is endorsing President 
Obama for a second term:

#-------------------------------------
Excerpt:

For these and many other reasons, we enthusiastically endorse President Barack 
Obama for a second term, and express the hope that his victory will be 
accompanied by a new Congress willing to work for policies that Americans need.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/28/opinion/sunday/barack-obama-for-president.html?pagewanted=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20121028

or

http://tinyurl.com/8f2c8xx

#-------------------------------------

Regards,

LelandJ
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to