Of course it did Leland, you are grasping for any validation of a worthless presidency. Good luck.
Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. On Oct 29, 2012, at 10:03, lelandj <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/29/2012 11:55 AM, Michael Oke wrote: >> It's not clearly part of the article when you are reading it on your phone. >> I had already looked up the answer but it doesn't matter what Lincoln' party >> is in comparison to today as that has no relevance. I wondered about recent >> history and found just what I expected. That is another worthless >> endorsement that is meaningless. > > The article had a lot of worth and meaning for me. LOL BTW, I should have > said _abolition of slavery_, (eg doing away with something by law). > > Regards, > > LelandJ > >> >> >> Michael Oke, II >> 661-349-6221 >> >> Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated >> recipient. >> >> On Oct 29, 2012, at 9:50, lelandj <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The question you asked is clearly part of the article, so it seems the >>> question you asked was making a point and requiring no answer. LOL Look >>> just under the Picture of Abraham Lincoln, and click on the caption, "New >>> York Times Endorsements Through the Ages". This link will take you all the >>> way back to the NY Times first endorsement of Abraham Lincoln in 1860. >>> >>> The Republican party of Abraham Lincoln is the Democratic party of today, ( >>> eg the abolism of slavery was a very progressive idea in Lincoln's day). >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> LelandJ >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10/29/2012 10:24 AM, Michael Oke wrote: >>>> No, it's an honest question but you may not know. >>>> >>>> >>>> Michael Oke, II >>>> 661-349-6221 >>>> >>>> Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated >>>> recipient. >>>> >>>> On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:23, lelandj <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> That's a rhetorical question. LOL Time for Tia Chi. Be back soon. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> LelandJ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 10/29/2012 10:16 AM, Michael Oke wrote: >>>>>> Who has the NYTimes endorsed over the last 20 years? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Michael Oke, II >>>>>> 661-349-6221 >>>>>> >>>>>> Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated >>>>>> recipient. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Oct 29, 2012, at 6:32, lelandj <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The link below is to a good article why the NY Times is endorsing >>>>>>> President Obama for a second term: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> #------------------------------------- >>>>>>> Excerpt: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For these and many other reasons, we enthusiastically endorse President >>>>>>> Barack Obama for a second term, and express the hope that his victory >>>>>>> will be accompanied by a new Congress willing to work for policies that >>>>>>> Americans need. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/28/opinion/sunday/barack-obama-for-president.html?pagewanted=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20121028 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> or >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/8f2c8xx >>>>>>> >>>>>>> #------------------------------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LelandJ [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
