On 11/11/2012 12:25 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 11/11/2012 01:10 PM, lelandj wrote:
http://watchdogwire.com/florida/2012/11/10/massive-voter-fraud-in-st-lucie-county-florida-141-turnout/
"official St Lucie County, FL 2012 election results. Only one precinct
had less than 113% turnout. The unofficial vote count is 175,554
registered voters 247,713 vote cards cast (141.10% ). The National
SEAL Museum, a St. Lucie county polling place, had 158.85% voter turn
out, the highest in the county."
How would Texas cope with that?
Florida should engage one of the big four accounting firms to perform an
operational audit of the current system, and make recommendation
Hi Leland,
How would the auditors identify the fraudulent ballots? THAT is what
has to be done!
I'm not sure about the current problems produced by the unreliable
system. A new system with the proper internal controls would have
checks in place to insure these kinds of problems would not occur, or if
they did, could be identified quickly before any damage occurred.
The starting point for an operational audit is a study of the current
system. Perhaps the current system is OK, but is not being followed.
If the current system is not being followed, the audit would identify
the areas of non-compliance. The final report would make recommendation
of how the current system could be improved.
Regards,
LelandJ
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
