In Connecticut one has to show a drivers license with a photo ID on it. No
one complains about disenfranchising here about that. We also use a paper
ballot containing for each candidate a circle that one darkens with a
special pen. It is very fast and can be recounted if necessary.
The problem with Florida is that the Republican West lost because of this
faulty voting but the Democrats wanted to win so that is why they like it.
Nick Geti
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Oke, II" <[email protected]>
To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
And again I tell you that anything of this nature is being bashed as
harmful. It would disenfranchise certain voters. I personally have no
issue with something of this nature being instituted but that would
probably require federal intervention.
Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221
Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated
recipient.
On Nov 11, 2012, at 1:33 PM, lelandj <[email protected]> wrote:
On 11/11/2012 02:29 PM, Michael Oke wrote:
Voter identification of that sort is being fought tooth and nail by
certain sectors of the current political regimes.
I'm talking about an internal control where a voter would provide proof
of eligibility to vote at the point of registration, and receive a unique
ID. From this point the voter could be tracked through the system, much
like UPS tracks a package from it point of origin to point of delivery.
This system would eliminate the problem of more votes being cast than
registered voters on record, or significantly less votes being cast than
registered voters on record, and provide a back tracking mechanism should
anyone try to use a unique ID more than once.
Regards,
LelandJ
Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221
Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated
recipient.
On Nov 11, 2012, at 11:15 AM, lelandj <[email protected]> wrote:
On 11/11/2012 12:25 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 11/11/2012 01:10 PM, lelandj wrote:
http://watchdogwire.com/florida/2012/11/10/massive-voter-fraud-in-st-lucie-county-florida-141-turnout/
"official St Lucie County, FL 2012 election results. Only one
precinct
had less than 113% turnout. The unofficial vote count is 175,554
registered voters 247,713 vote cards cast (141.10% ). The National
SEAL Museum, a St. Lucie county polling place, had 158.85% voter
turn
out, the highest in the county."
How would Texas cope with that?
Florida should engage one of the big four accounting firms to perform
an
operational audit of the current system, and make recommendation
Hi Leland,
How would the auditors identify the fraudulent ballots? THAT is what
has to be done!
Just off the top of my head, an internal control might work something
like this. The starting point in a voter casting a ballot is
registering to vote. Because many people have the same name, at the
time a person registers to vote, they could be issued a unique ID
number.
In order for the voter to receive a ballot, when they go to vote, they
could be required to present their unique ID number. This number could
be check, and if its valid, and has not already been used, the voter
could receive a ballot.
If the system is automated the voter could be required to enter his
unique ID to cast a vote. The voting machine would check to see if the
unique ID number had not already been used within a statewide voting
system; before, accepting the voters input.
This kind of system would need strong security to protect the voters
privacy.
Without some kind of internal control in place, such as the example I
provided above, it may not be possible to identify fraudulent votes.
Regards,
LelandJ
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/FF71BCEF836E4089A287B49E12A27826@dual
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
