Yes, there is filter software that filters out many things. I don't know if this is decided on at a top level, or whether it is done at a local level.
I makes sense that the US Military would not want subversive and traitorous sites to be available to any soldier. It is a security risk, plain and simple. Just as you don't allow children to view pornography, you don't allow soldiers to view a modern day Tokyo Roses. --- Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 25, 2006, at 10:51 PM, Michael Oke, II wrote: > > > and we are to believe that the posting is real > because? ... > > And your evidence that it *isn't* real is....? > > Military censorship has been noted several times by > list members who > cannot access links because their browsers are > blocked. Perhaps they > could verify the veracity of these claims (assuming, > of course, that > they are able to read the article in question). > > -- Ed Leafe > -- http://leafe.com > -- http://dabodev.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > Right Wing Gear http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
