No need to hold the scanned images in a database - just a [path and]
filename.
Or there's always PostgreSQL.
On 23/04/2013 15:49, Dave Crozier wrote:
Joe,
If you are going to hold the actual scanned images as well as the OCR'd result
then compact edition will soon run out of space. I have developed a full system
her that does exactly what you describe and we are up about 30Gb of scans
already after 18 months. SQL compact has a limit of 4Gb as does sqlexpress 2008
with the original SQL MSDE having only 2Gb. which isn't a lot of data in this
respect.
Dave
<snip>
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
