Dave, I just talked to their technical support department and was told that the storage system is only limited by the space available on the hard drive. I expressed my skepticism based on the 4 gig limit you mentioned but was assured that the system creates as many databases as it needs. A previous version could create a maximum of 10 for a 40 gig total but the current version is unlimited. I wondered if there is a limit to the amount of data that can be in one folder but was assured that there is not and that one can do a seamless text search over the entire system.
Does this seem believable to you? I would have expected that Microsoft would prevent this from happening either through the software design or by licensing. If the Neat company has done something tricky to have this work, what are my chances of accessing the data directly? Thanks - Joe On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 6:19 AM, Dave Crozier wrote: > >Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:19:14 +0000 >From: Dave Crozier >To: [email protected] >cc: >Subject: RE: [NF] Neat scanner system info and questions > >Joe, >If you are going to hold the actual scanned images as well as the OCR'd result >then compact edition will soon run out of space. I have developed a full >system her that does exactly what you describe and we are up about 30Gb of >scans already after 18 months. SQL compact has a limit of 4Gb as does >sqlexpress 2008 with the original SQL MSDE having only 2Gb. which isn't a lot >of data in this respect. > >Dave > >-----Original Message----- >From: ProFox [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe Yoder >Sent: 22 April 2013 20:09 >To: [email protected] >Subject: [NF] Neat scanner system info and questions > >I am evaluating a Neat desktop scanner/software system. Its purpose is to >scan all the paper work one would ordinarily file and to save the images >electronically. It scans various sizes of paper into its input queue where >the data is OCRed, a document type is assigned, and the database fields are >populated. > >On the desktop, the users sees cabinet structure on the left, database fields >in the center, and scanned image on the right. The image can be enlarged and >scrolled as needed, the document type and fields in the record can be modified >if necessary, and the records placed anywhere in the cabinet structure. > >The system can import data and receive documents printed to it. It has some >reporting capabilities and export options including a direct link to Quick >Books. There is, however, no provision to allow a Quick Books user to "Drill >down" to the source image from inside Quickbooks. > >I have been told that the system is designed as an electronic filing cabinet >rather than an accounting system. It only supports 3 document types: >Contacts, Documents, and Receipts. I believe I can adapt this scheme to >handle the limited accounting I need to do but would really like to be able to >access the data directly from Foxpro rather than going through their export >process. > >I have submitted 10 different suggestions for improvement to the company so >far and gotten positive official replies to eight of them. It seems like this >is a good sign. If they implement most of what I have suggested the package >will provide better functionality and be much easier to use. > >The Neat system installs and uses Microsoft SQL Server Compact Edition. I >have asked several tech support individuals if there is a licensing issue with >my accessing the data through the "back door" - using direct access to the SQL >server. The responses I have received indicated no prohibition but no attempt >on their part to support any questions or problems that result from this >approach. > >Here are my questions: >1. Are any of you familiar with this or similar systems and willing to give an >opinion about whether the Neat system I have described at $400 seems like a >reasonable deal? Are there other systems available that provide equivalent or >superior features at the same or lower cost? >2. I have no experience in working with SQL outside of VFP. Would it be >feasible to connect to the server without any supporting information from the >company? If so - a link to resources and examples would be quite helpful > >Thanks in Advance, > >Joe > > >--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html >--- > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
