Dave,

Which part of Singer did you work for?  I was seconded to the Link-Miles
Simulator Division from 78 to 82.

John

John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Dave Crozier
> Sent: 26 April 2013 13:41
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [NF] The Tech Industry's Darkest Secret: It's All About Age
> 
> Adam,
> Never knew you worked for ICL, so did I for 6 years when they took over
> Singer, who I was with originally. You'll remember the yearly "October
> Revolutions" then! lol
> 
> Dave
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ProFox [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam
> Buckland
> Sent: 26 April 2013 09:26
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: RE: [NF] The Tech Industry's Darkest Secret: It's All About Age
> 
> Hi Virgil,
> 
> Late to the thread, but I have to disagree with you. Microsoft did not
employ
> exclusively experienced programmers, I had two other Companies (ICL and
> HP Labs) under my belt before I went to Microsoft, yes I relocated from
the
> UK to Washington, but the interview process was more about what you were
> capable of rather than what you knew (My tests were on C, MASM, Unix and
> compilers and assemblers in general).
> 
> There was as you allude to hero worship within MS towards BG and others,
> but the pressure to produce fast tight code was immense, code review
> meetings were the biggest bitch sessions I've ever known however the
> latitude given to programming staff is great. I had a chaise longue in my
> office, another guy had a baby grand piano. I was there at the end of the
80's
> and often wish I'd stayed on as the guy I went over with from HP stayed an
> extra 5 years and retired on his options...
> 
> Microsoft definitely did not employ cheap labour, yes there was a kudos
> working for them but that evaporated when everyone you knew worked for
> them... the salary was good and the options and benefits were too...
> 
> But then that was over 20 years ago and a lot of water has flowed under
the
> bridge since then....
> 
> Adam.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ProFox [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Virgil
> Bierschwale
> Sent: 24 April 2013 13:05
> To: 'ProFox Email List'
> Subject: RE: [NF] The Tech Industry's Darkest Secret: It's All About Age
> 
> That is what we are told by the media.
> 
> One of these days people are going to realize that the media is owned,
> controlled, and shackled by six multinational corporations.
> 
> 
> 
> Let me show you what was happening back in the 80's
> 
> 
> 
> Through the architects and program managers, Gates was able to control the
> work of every programmer at Microsoft, but to do so reliably required
cheap
> and obedient labor. Gates set a policy that consciously avoided hiring
> experienced programmers, specializing, instead, in recent computer science
> graduates.
> 
> 
> 
> Microsoft became a kind of cult. By hiring inexperienced workers and
> indoctrinating them into a religion that taught the concept that
> metaprogrammers were better than mere programmers and that Bill Gates,
> as the metametaprogrammer, was perfect, Microsoft created a system of
> hero worship that extended Gates's will into every aspect of the lives of
> employees he had not even met. It worked for Kim Il Sung in North Korea,
> and it works in the suburbs east of Seattle too.
> 
> 
> 
> Most software companies hire the friends of current employees, but
> Microsoft hires kids right out of college and relocates them. The
company's
> appetite for new programming meat is nearly insatiable. One year Microsoft
> got in trouble with the government of India for hiring nearly every
computer
> science graduate in the country and moving them all to Redmond.
> 
> 
> 
> After studying this for ten years to see why I can't find work anymore, I
have
> come to realize that this is only happening in the mega corporations for
the
> most part.
> 
> 
> 
> The readers of this list are not typically affected by such things as they
are
> self employed, and if they get their business from similar sized
businesses,
> they should be good.
> 
> 
> 
> Problem is, those that get their business from the megacorporations seem
to
> be experiencing what the writer discusses.
> 
> 
> 
> I first noticed this back around 2000 which is why I worked to get my way
into
> management and out of development.
> 
> 
> 
> When my mother was diagnosed with cancer, I moved home to texas
> thinking I could find work in Austin and ya'll know most of that story.
> 
> 
> 
> Ten years later I find myself pigeonholed as the typical software
developer
> with outdated skills that he writes about in his article.
> 
> 
> 
> All of this said though, what I finally realized was happening in 2011 and
> 2012 was that the supply is greater than the demand which allows things
like
> this to happen.
> 
> 
> 
> The reason that supply is greater than demand is the offshoring of jobs
which
> is why I fight it via Keep America At Work.
> 
> 
> 
> That doesn't mean that I don't think that every country needs good jobs,
> because I do.
> 
> 
> 
> It is just that when you honestly pull your head out of the sand and run
the
> numbers, the data doesn't lie as I attempt to show in this article.
> 
> 
> 
> http://keepamericaatwork.com/archives/210917
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ProFox [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alan Bourke
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 6:31 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [NF] The Tech Industry's Darkest Secret: It's All About Age
> 
> 
> 
> Sure but was it not always thus, for all types of tech professionals?
> 
> 
> 
> It also depends on location and skill base - here in Ireland there are no
kids
> coming out of college with IT and development skills because they were all
> told 'tech is dead, go into pharma' after the dotcom bubble. To an extent
> where despite being a country under an IMF bailout with high-ish
> unemployment, the Googles and Microsofts who have their European bases
> here often have to recruit people from outside the country because they
> can't find enough people from inside.
> 
> 
> 
> But yes - upskill or die, as ever.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Post Messages to:  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
> 
> Subscription Maintenance:  <http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox>
> http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> 
> OT-free version of this list:
> <http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech>
> http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> 
> Searchable Archive:  <http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox>
> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> 
> This message:
> <http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1366803078.9218.1406612220957
> 38.3C93
> [email protected]>
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1366803078.9218.140661222095738
> .3C930
> [email protected]
> 
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of
the
> author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is
added
> to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
> 
> 
> 
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to