>> I can do this stuff but considering the amount of error trapping and
> other overhead involved, after which it's not guaranteed to work 100% of
> the time when I need it, it just doesn't seem like there's much benefit for
> the cost.
>
>
Well, I think the optimal technique is to create the message as a text
file, saved to disk in a unique folder/filename combination, like
Errors/datetime-random-number.txt and then try to send the message in a
TRY... CATCH. It goes, good, it doesn't ignore it.
Or as one of my favorite project rescues said, ON ERROR *
Was that the year of living dangerously? :)
I think if you do that on a submarine, everybody gets wet...
But I'll think about it, at least in-house where I can control my own
internal email server assuming the program can still talk to it.
Ken Dibble
www.stic-cil.org
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/5.2.1.1.1.20130801100835.01d1b...@pop-server.stny.rr.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
