On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Ken Dibble <[email protected]> wrote:
> > This could have easily have turned out in a digital 9/11 a few times over. >> >> http://gigaom.com/2013/09/16/**belgian-telco-says-it-was-** >> hacked-while-reports-point-to-**nsa-or-gchq-as-culprit/<http://gigaom.com/2013/09/16/belgian-telco-says-it-was-hacked-while-reports-point-to-nsa-or-gchq-as-culprit/> >> > > I am absolutely opposed to any effort by the US government to eavesdrop on > email, or any other communications, without a warrant, issued by an > independent (and PUBLIC) court, which is directed at specific communicators > based on reliable evidence that those specific communicators are involved > in a crime. > > That being said, I don't understand "digital 9/11'" in this context. It > appears that what the media called a "virus" was in fact a targeted > eavesdropping mechanism that didn't damage software or equipment, but stole > information. > > It was far worse than that. BICS - a major European provider - was targeted. The whole infrastructure was in danger ! Estimated costs of the removal of the malware : 5.000.000 E...... A+ JML --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPqLOBy=niq3a+wj7pwj70msz5j1friambz-veohaoyvujv...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
