On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Ken Dibble <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>  I do not understand why anyone would consider localized mail client over a
>> web based one.  Being able to log into your account anywhere and not need
>> a
>> client seems to be expected.  Being able to search you entire account for
>> a
>> specific message anywhere and on any device just makes sense.
>>
>
> These are work-based accounts, not personal accounts. Most of our
> employees do not travel as part of their work. Those who do have laptops,
> on which fat email clients are installed for access to email. In cases
> where the person needs access to the same account on multiple devices, the
> client is configured to leave messages on the server after downloading, for
> a reasonable period of time. Once downloaded to a fat client, messages can
> be accessed much more quickly and flexibly than from any webmail I've ever
> experienced. Therefore there is no need to sacrifice speed, reliability, or
> flexibility for mobility in our case.
> ------------------------


I was thinking that you were at a meeting or at your kids sporting practice
and you needed to check out what was stated a week or a month ago.  Once
done that issue is put to rest.




-- 
Stephen Russell
Sr. Analyst
Ring Container Technology
Oakland TN

901.246-0159 cell


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajidmyj2jioxdbbxbyrclpmxsw3eazcd7vabs--vcwpkmz0...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to