Thanks Dave I'm not upset on using Microsoft. After all my work is done on that. I was wondering about hardware level virtualisation which should mean the box does it, I think. The reason for the sudden interest is that net 4.5.1 does not work on server 2003. So I need to update. But I think Linux has more possibilities with email servers and news groups than exchange, but I would like to do it on one machine. Neither is a large overload. Al
-----Original Message----- Al, Virtualisation requires a base operating system to run the "virtualiser" on for example VMWare. You could run windows 7 as a base machine with VMWare as a std program and in VMWare spin up a linux box and windows boxes etc that would run no problem. However, running Windows as the base operating system isn't the most efficient solution and Linux is best as the OS runs quicker, not having all the M$ Graphical stuff in it. With Microsoft HyperV which runs on top of Microsoft Server you can do the same thing and my experience is that it is quicker and also free but it keeps you in the M$ camp exclusively! _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/002501cf3468$84b34ce0$8e19e6a0$@com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
