Yeah, that does work, but you can't tweak a DE for a form, say for if it needed just an additional table, you'd have to subclass a new DE with the table. Think I may just go the programmatic route and build the DE on the fly.
Fred On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Tracy Pearson <[email protected]> wrote: > Fred Taylor wrote on 2014-04-02: > > Thanks, Tracy. I've looked into it a bit, but not sure I really want > all > > those gyrations since the DE that now ends up on the form is ReadOnly. > I > > understand why that is, but it presents a different set of challenges. > > > > Fred > > > > Fred, > > You are able to reuse the DE across multiple forms that use the same tables > (supposedly). > > I know that didn't happen here. We ended up having a different VCX for each > module to keep our sanity. Over 400 SCX files in our system. When we > decided > to make that happen, I had written a routine to create the DE's, clear out > the tables from the SCX's and attach the DE's into the SCX. > > You know, YMMV. > > Tracy > > > > Tracy Pearson > PowerChurch Software > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJCBksrwO665h7XHLzMd=KJQQ+08Yxg=r0bd0okmlcgvpdh...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
