The local police force could send warnings to me all the time, but without a
specific target and time, I have no way of preventing it.

Folks, ya'll are grasping at straws, just as you say one person in a very
large corporation should know what the lowest man on the totem pole is
doing.

It ain't going to happen, so lets put this into perspective.

I tell pete a story,
Pete tells Michael the same story,
Michael tells ed the same story,
Ed tells ted the same story,
Ted tells virgil the same story.

By the time it gets back to me, it is totally different.
This has been historically proven time and time again.

In a large corporation, the bottom manager tells his boss his story.
His boss tells his boss the same story, leaving out things he doesn’t
believe is pertinent,
The process repeats up the ladder and pertinent things are not mentioned.

The only way for accountability is to hold the manager responsible for what
his department does and to give him the tools to do the job.

Without those two items, you have nothing, but finger pointing which arm
chair quarterbacks are very good at doing.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Hal Kaplan
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 11:17 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [OT] Rush Limbaugh: Why Republicans Lost

Virgil Bierschwale wrote ...

=> While I disagree with what Michael said, how can you say 
=> that one person could have prevented it from happening when 
=> they didn't even know it was going to happen ?

Virgil, this is not the proper place to go into detail about all the
explanations for how 9-11 came to pass, but I will answer your question
briefly and you can contact me offline if you want to know more.

There are many "theories" about what happened before, on, and after 9-11
that are quite different from what has been published.  There is also sworn
or published testimony to the fact that several foreign government
intelligence agencies (11 or 13, IIRC) sent warnings to their American
counterparts regarding 9-11 months before it came to pass.  There are also
many particulars and incidents relating to 9-11 that clearly defy the
official explanations given.

What I want the new Congress to do is perform an honest, impartial
investigation of 9-11.  If they can show that what I said is wrong without
resorting to secrecy or other cover-up tactics, fine.  No one would be
happier to know that than I.  OTOH, if they find something other than what
we have been spoon-fed, then let's act accordingly based on those findings.

One last thing.  None of you know me personally but if you did it would be
abundantly cleaar to you that I do not latch on to things like this on a
whim.  I spent a long time reading and studying and discussing my thoughts
with others before I formed my opinion.

HALinNY


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to