Virgil Bierschwale wrote ... => While I disagree with what Michael said, how can you say => that one person could have prevented it from happening when => they didn't even know it was going to happen ?
Virgil, this is not the proper place to go into detail about all the explanations for how 9-11 came to pass, but I will answer your question briefly and you can contact me offline if you want to know more. There are many "theories" about what happened before, on, and after 9-11 that are quite different from what has been published. There is also sworn or published testimony to the fact that several foreign government intelligence agencies (11 or 13, IIRC) sent warnings to their American counterparts regarding 9-11 months before it came to pass. There are also many particulars and incidents relating to 9-11 that clearly defy the official explanations given. What I want the new Congress to do is perform an honest, impartial investigation of 9-11. If they can show that what I said is wrong without resorting to secrecy or other cover-up tactics, fine. No one would be happier to know that than I. OTOH, if they find something other than what we have been spoon-fed, then let's act accordingly based on those findings. One last thing. None of you know me personally but if you did it would be abundantly cleaar to you that I do not latch on to things like this on a whim. I spent a long time reading and studying and discussing my thoughts with others before I formed my opinion. HALinNY _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
