At 15:00 2015-11-17, [email protected] wrote:
On 2015-11-13 03:50, Dave Crozier wrote:
[snip]
Remember when the VB/M$ camp (correct me as needed) was saying how
this LATE BINDING was such a bad thing??? So many "oh no, that's
bad" things turned out to be JUST FINE thank you very much. FUD at its best.
Hardly.
If you need late binding, fine, use it.
I like early binding, because it catches errors earlier in the
development cycle. I have had many times with VFP where a simple
typo blew up during execution. With a smarter compiler (early
binding), that error would never have made it to execution.
A mix of the two is fine with me. My preference is use late
binding when needed, but otherwise use early binding.
Sincerely,
Gene wirchenko
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
