On 2015-11-19 14:19, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
At 15:00 2015-11-17, [email protected] wrote:
On 2015-11-13 03:50, Dave Crozier wrote:
[snip]
Remember when the VB/M$ camp (correct me as needed) was saying how
this LATE BINDING was such a bad thing??? So many "oh no, that's bad"
things turned out to be JUST FINE thank you very much. FUD at its
best.
Hardly.
If you need late binding, fine, use it.
I like early binding, because it catches errors earlier in the
development cycle. I have had many times with VFP where a simple typo
blew up during execution. With a smarter compiler (early binding),
that error would never have made it to execution.
A mix of the two is fine with me. My preference is use late
binding when needed, but otherwise use early binding.
Agreed. It's nice to catch things at compile-time. I did like that
about DotNet C#.
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
