Too late - I already replied back to your last response! But - i know what happened - you read things in order - and replied immediately instead of seeing the other replies to the thread...

-K-

On 1/9/2019 12:58 PM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
On 2019-01-09 14:13, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Jan 9, 2019, at 12:58 PM, Gene Wirchenko <ge...@telus.net> wrote:

    The numbers do not make sense.  Does that "100K" mean 100,000 messages or 100 kilobytes?  How does 280 relate to 133,000?

It’s a monthly limit on the number of messages. And as Ted pointed
out, each post gets sent to each subscriber: 475 as of last May,
though it’s down to 474 as of Jan1
(https://leafe.com/archives/msg/512459). So that’s where the 133K
comes from.


Ah, I see this now.  Please disregard my last post.

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/d9360deb-a5c2-96b3-1c8e-d5a3cc761...@gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to