It's not just speed, although I do think LMI's compression/diffing algorithms are way ahead of all the others. It's also the selection filtering and syncing capabilities. Most of the other solutions are no better than using File Explorer in an RDP environment and in some cases the early releases were so buggy with file transfer as to render them unusable for that purpose. The one flaw LMI still has is when transferring an existing file over a certain size, it fails to overwrite the target file and leaves it in a corrupted state. Of course, I want to replace that file anyway so I delete the file on the target and transfer it as if it were new.
I don't think it's how often I have a lot of files to transfer (size or quantity) but how much pain does it cause me when I do have to do that. -- rk -----Original Message----- From: ProfoxTech <[email protected]> On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions, LLC Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 10:51 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [NF] TeamViewer alternatives On 12/18/2019 10:50 AM, Richard Kaye wrote: > It's adequate. LMI is still head and shoulders above the rest when it comes > to file transfer. > > -- > > rk > Hi Richard, You must be dealing with large files transferring quickly. My interactions have dealt with files NOT of great size, and very low frequency so it was adequate. How often are you transferring files?? _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives This message: https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/mn2pr10mb3407dc31d4399de7bd8ce333d2...@mn2pr10mb3407.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
