My company is pushing our ERP from on-prem to on-line.  We were told we
have to DELETE a lot of that old worthless data.  That is 400 gigs of GL
detail in one table alone as well as more in supporting tables.  The point
is we were told that we no longer need ALL of those transactions that are
past IRS rules.  It's been decades since I have used QB and have no memory
of deleting anything in it.

Have you investigated QB online?  I don't know if you could post t QB
online but figure with WestWind you can.  When you push to the cloud that
won't take old antiquated data as a guess, they will expect that you will
keep it on your own computer.  That is what we are going to do because we
can keep the old version on-prem.

I am just passing on what we are doing ourselves.  We have a lot of
learning on how to deal with data that is no longer ours and our data
warehouse.  With your situation, you may find that what QB presents to
users is just fine, and learning how to post a new way isn't that bad.  As
well as giving you more billings in the conversion.



On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 12:28 PM MB Software Solutions, LLC <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah but they're near 2GB in file size (like 18 yrs worth of data) so
> they're in need of a solution beyond QB (or find a way to make QB keep
> working for them).  QB Online isn't an option as their VFP app
> integrates with the CFO's QB Desktop version.
>
> I'm no QB expert but I'd like to think there's some sort of process that
> can be done to consolidate/cleanup data over decades.
>
>
> On 1/19/2022 11:09 AM, AndyHC wrote:
> > Twenty some years ago I used Quicken (QuickBooks lite) and was so
> > impressed by the user interface I recommended it as an example of how
> > to write user-friendly code. I was less impressed by their lack of
> > transparency on file structures that allowed them to charge annually
> > for tax rules updates, bu still, pretty much everybody does that now
> > and - it stands out in my memory.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Post Messages to: [email protected]
> > Subscription Maintenance:
> http://track.smtpsendemail.com/9074967/c?p=FJZZDP9yTbjgJ5ZPUwSUS-wIKpFZwpCv_BCeW2JXWfQUPFzRydkhXLgK3_GnxuzLgnNyNJM3u9zIDF1L3FlFoZDbBjiysRSvqRVm5bqndk8MCL14hvxFDtHmFexpubyG4pB7MtdtEyrM_v8Awdtflzysq7Mo4M0fHrz72FUclkY=
> > OT-free version of this list:
> >
> http://track.smtpsendemail.com/9074967/c?p=iWuDNlLfzFLZnoO2xL9Etz2nD-I0ou2NF4S26gPe5r5uNgJXb7CKXzNLQB_bWFD2L5kjDknmiO8Vj0UZ0pgrmYeOyZmrKPtDJIjXy_S8ryHEKjYumbeuhyW93lRn2fOSinKdUf3rgginRyyxr-dQ8Aso68OpNsKOUKzUGu7oz0s=
> > Searchable Archive:
> http://track.smtpsendemail.com/9074967/c?p=Z59I_KFsAbc-pg6LY43CMh7z_sPuEHEAMOwhBcs-4Kk6q7cwI9UtNFtR39RIMeOMDYNY7As0MgFAynXrSjt7qpWfZY6mClNjzKM8LdljH2Ey2vjhonDtK3tp9smXB-LAbx9MXHJkWfV2J-zEvkbUoQ==
> > This message:
> >
> http://track.smtpsendemail.com/9074967/c?p=j5twmiPldUyjasmSmAgVceCg8jW7n5Rz9LHNiksyAO_qFEmM-3VNCCLaRBKrmS6sPu2AdK_ur1mrZ-5KqkhssqLpQqYjMLwLatvRFYRHHH_WxTGoldv8wSmDSBoTF1_JoLf5fhuJ1fIsSirV2T85W5KiSF_V0jCYTx8l4cBcxwYATptUdSXk8lqh8DQcgyMYZI3ngLKj8WG8_zbmcBTHrYTxS4aCvaKwXZWoY4Iy1eQ=
> > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions
> > of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This
> > statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too
> > stupid to see the obvious.
>
> --
> Michael J. Babcock, MCP
> Fox/VFP dev since 1997
> Developer of FabNet estimating software - mbsoftwaresolutions.com
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CAJidMY+X=xrpjesgnk0bip78mr_+xnp9qgdycps16uaqhdd...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to