Not an approved way, but I've been able to run VFP just by copying the
entire directory from an existing install to another PC and just running
the exe.

Rick Q
quilh...@gmail.com



On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 1:57 PM Paul Newton <paul.newton.h...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Jürgen
>
> Trying to run VFP9SP2RT.exe from C:\Temp\Woody gives "This app can't run
> on your PC", trying to run as Admin gives "Windows cannot find
> C:\Temp\Woody\VFP9SP2RT.EXE"
>
> Paul
>
> On 30/10/2022 17:36, Jürgen Wondzinski wrote:
> > Nope. Win 11 is just Win10 with some new UI, from a VFP perspective. Von
> meinem/meiner Galaxy gesendet
> > -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------Von: Paul Newton <
> paul.newton.h...@gmail.com> Datum: 30.10.22  18:20  (GMT+01:00) An:
> profox@leafe.com Betreff: Re: VFP9 installation on a new machine Thanks
> JürgenThat's a great help.  I wonder if there are any gotchas for Win 11 as
> opposed to Win 10?PaulOn 30/10/2022 17:08, Jürgen Wondzinski wrote:> May I
> selfishly point you toWoody-prolib.blogspot.com? Von meinem/meiner Galaxy
> gesendet> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------Von: Paul Newton<
> paul.newton.h...@gmail.com>  Datum: 30.10.22  16:38  (GMT+01:00)
> An:Profox@leafe.com  Betreff: VFP9 installation on a new machine Hi
> allIt's a long time since I had to install VFP9 and a couple of things have
> arisen.  I installed the original RTM and applied SP2 but I have two
> different files, both purportedly SP2.VFP9.0sp2-KB925841-X86-Enu.exe
> (34.8MB)VFP9.0sp2-KB955370-X86-Enu.exe (1.9 MB)According
> towww.berezniker.com/  the one I need (and used) is the first one but I
> wondered if anybody knows anything about the other one (the KBs are no
> longer available even on the web archive).I then appliedHotfix 3 for SP2  -
> VFP90SP2-KB968409-ENU.EXE  (10.8 MB)ActiveX security updates -
> VFP9.0sp2-KB958371-X86-Enu.exe (4.6 MB)GDIPLUS.DLL security updates -
> VFP9.0sp2-KB971105-X86-Enu.exe (1.9 MB)In the past I have also installed
> the VFPCOM utility,the OLE DB provider and MSXML 4.0 Service Pack 2 and I'm
> wondering if I should do so again.  Any thoughts?Many thanksPaul Newton---
> StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html---_______________________________________________Post Messages
> to:ProFox@leafe.comSubscription  Maintenance:
> https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxOT-free  version of this
> list:https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtechSearchable
> Archive:https://leafe.com/archivesThis  message:
> https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/75dfa2e2-713e-5ab8-68df-3ccf88ff4...@gmail.com**
> All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
> author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is
> added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the
> obvious.> _______________________________________________> Post Messages
> to:ProFox@leafe.com> Subscription Maintenance:
> https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox> OT-free version of this
> list:https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech> Searchable
> Archive:https://leafe.com/archives> This message:
> https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/rde825y9uh99p4i.rz...@mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de>
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of
> the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the
> obvious._______________________________________________Post Messages to:
> ProFox@leafe.comSubscription Maintenance:
> https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxOT-free version of this
> list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtechSearchable
> Archive: https://leafe.com/archivesThis message:
> https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/2ff5b752-f70b-b307-861e-70e47c04b...@gmail.com**
> All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
> author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is
> added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the
> obvious.
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: https://leafe.com/archives
This message: 
https://leafe.com/archives/byMID/CADaZP2nvf9=fKWGRcggmVWziBt4prVxagHAGhN6Xuccq=cy...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to