On Dec 15, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Stephen the Cook wrote:
> For software with a year of 2000 in it's title and it's just been
> found? I
> agree that it's a bad hole but it's taken a long time to be found.
2000 was the *first* version subject to the flaws. They have
persisted in all new versions released up to this year.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
