The neocons are the leaders of a network of supporters that quite evidentially scares most people from even talking about them. Not a one of the mainstream "news" people, even Chris Matthews, who I mostly like, seem willing to go there - despite the mountain of evidence that has accumulated since this started.
There are only 2 ways this can go now: (1) they get even more power and shut people like us up, or (2) they are put on trial. I had hoped the Libby trial would be the springboard to going after the next one (Cheney), but you see what actually happened, how the "news" shaped that into a "feel sorry for Libby" moment. Now there's the prosecutor's 'thing' going on. Maybe that will get Cheney on the stand, so he can be caught in some lies. These developments show there is a groundswell of resentment for that gang, but they also show that nobody has the stomach or guts to take on them on for the essence of what they've done, which is conspiracy to defraud the American people into waging their war. The key to this equation is to go full circle back to the beginning and ask the question that has been buried again and again: "if the list of reasons for the invasion of Iraq was fraudulent, as it has been proved to be, then exactly what was the real list of reasons for the invasion?" The American media barons, the ones who led the march to war, have settled on the "faulty intelligence" excuse and reinforced this "truth" so many times that nobody dare question it. This is how psyops works, using the principle of psychological reinforcement. As Madison Ave so well knows - and we see it on TV all the time - pound any message into people's heads over and over and over, and no matter how much a person resists or resents the message, it gets through to the unconscious mind. These "bubbles" are planted, and then through reinforcement they "crystallize". Once a thought crystallizes, it's extremely hard to excise it. Many people believe mechanics like this have been used only by the Nazis and the Communists, but that's not true, it's been used right here, and this case is a perfect example. Because the most serious consequences of what they've done are pushed off into the future, and because the "news" is as it is, many people still opt for the TV instead of the streets. For the sake of this country - and so much more - we absolutely, positively must break this cycle. There's one last thing I'd like to say: what motivates me isn't so much the Vietnam experience, which I assume people automatically think; it's also the recollection of an elderly couple I had met in my travels who grew up in Dresden, Germany during the 30's. The message they tried so hard to convey to me was that they had no choice whatsoever but to go along with the power of the state at the time. Reflecting on America today, and this situation in particular, but also the mega trend in progress towards the Big Brother/Police State, I take their message very seriously. Bill > The group that lead the American people into the unnecessary war with > Iraq (eg The Neo-Cons), could be classified as a subversive > organization intent on overthrowing our Constitutional form of > government, and replacing our Democracy with a more > theocratic form of > government patterned after the government of countries like > Israel. If > this is the case, then very serious crimes have been > committed against > our US Constitutional Government and the American people. Some > indicators of where the Neo-Cons were going are: > > 1) The Patriot Act which trumps our Constitution rights to freedom, > privacy, and due process by giving the executive branch of government > unbridled powers to do whatever they wanted regardless of the > American > Constitution. > > 2) Packing the courts with judges of an extreme religious > fundamentalist background, who would favor following the Bible rather > than the constitution and judicial law in reaching legal > decisions and > in metering out punishment. President Bush even tried to put his > personal counsel on the Supreme Court, but even his own Religious > Righter followers wouldn't have it. > > 3) A executive branch that has absolutely no respect for American > constitutional rights to freedom, privacy and due process. > > 4) Hand picked Neo-Conservative and Bushies appointed to key cabinet > and other high level Bush Administration positions, who > clearly served > the Neo-Conservatives and Bush Administration agendas, rather > than being > independent and serving the best interest of the American people. A > good example of this the the appointment of A. Gonzalez to > the position > of Attorney General. Gonzales is a long term friend of > President Bush > and has clearly put the wishes of the executive branch ahead > of anything > else, and has played politics by firing staff that did not attack > members of the Democratic party, rather than remaining independent of > political parties and personal relations with the executive > branch and > serving the American people by enforcing Constitutional freedoms, > privacy, and due process. > > 5) An secretive executive branch that has not been open and > honest with > the Senate, the House, and the American people. As a matter of fact, > the Executive branch that was a machine to spread disinformation and > propaganda. > > The list could go on and on but this should get everyone thinking. > Being a member of a subversive organization intent on > overthrowing the > US Constitutional form of government is very serious. > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > . _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
