Dave,

What happens when VFP will no longer run on Windows? You can't expect
users to run old and unsupported Operating Systems. The Bean Counters
will never allow it.

Ditto to the Big Number point. I think I've been rather conservative
too! :o(

You certainly have taken your hand to many area's and the awards are
well deserved.

We are concentrating on a part of the market that the company was
founded in and key members of staff have many, many, many years in that
area. "Know the user, know the task!" (boy does that saying keep
rattling around in my head!)

We will have to migrate somewhere as we want to be around providing our
customers our unique products for many many years to come. Each system
we sell has a possible 20-30 year lifespan!

If I can keep everything in VFP then I'll be very happy but I just don't
think that is possible. However, can these provide a ray of light?

http://www.etecnologia.net/
http://www.vulcandotnet.com/

Surely keeping the status quo with my software and compiling into a .NET
app surely is the least painful path? This will ensure I can spend time
providing solutions to my customers with the Fantastic Tool that is VFP.

Regards


Robert Jennings
Development and Computer Services Manager
Marine Software

 


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Dave Bernard
Posted At: 02 April 2007 17:56
Posted To: Profox Archive
Conversation: Another life after VFP thread?
Subject: RE: Another life after VFP thread?


Robert-

What a well-thought-out and well-written email. 

Many folks have recently focused on what particular language/tool to
which they "need" to switch due to recent events. Your focus on the
business issues at hand is refreshing and right on target, IMHO. "There
are no technical problems, only business problems."

Your $400K number is very similar to the $500K number I've had as a
working cost to bring our development capabilities in .NET up to par
with what we can already do in VFP; and I truly believe that is a
conservative number.
We're a small company, and that is a big number.

I can speak very clearly for our company; there will be no "conversions"
to .NET with existing products and services because it makes no business
sense (for us). Period.

While we do occasional .NET work, we are paid for every bit of it. Same
with LAMP work; same with C++ work.

But most of our existing work is with VFP, and will continue as long as
it makes good business sense. We have won multiple awards in the last 12
months for our work (see the news on our site) which is underpinned by
VFP throughout. We will be sponsors for two VFP conferences this year
(FoxForward and SWFox) and continue to grow our staff of VFP developers.


Dave Bernard
The Intellection Group, Inc.
http://www.IntellectionGroup.com

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Robert Jennings
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 12:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Another life after VFP thread?

Hi all,

I don't often get time to read the profox list as I'm busy with my head
in code, providing solutions to problems posed by customers.

I think that the thread has certainly brought up many thoughts and
discussions of languages. It may be fine for a programmer who goes from
company to company to pick up lots of languages and write software in
them (Which is fine) but my problem is that I have applications that I
have out in the Market, we have over a thousand sites/ships using our
software. 

Prior to 2000 the company had software written in Clipper running in
DOS.
VFP was the natural progression to provide the software on the Windows
Platform. (yes a rewrite was required from the ground up) Saying that,
it took 2 years to Migrate 1 application from Clipper to VFP.

<snip>



[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to