> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of mrgmhale > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 1:41 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Another life after VFP thread? > > > Where I work now, it is VFP7 which was released 6 years ago and does the > > job. > > I still compile in VFP7, mostly to avoid taking my clients through an > uninstall/reinstall just to get the VFP9 run-time files properly > registered, > and laziness in not designing a way to do that with a routine update in > the > exe/app files. I code in VPF9, using SET ENGINEBEHAVIOR 70, just because > I > like the editor more. VFP7 is plenty punchy for my needs, and quite > stable. > > Gil >
I am installing VFP7 and VFP9 runtimes at the same time. I have existing VFP7 apps and I am now doing development in VFP9. The two apps could very well reside on the same machine. Am I doing something wrong? Jeff Jeff Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 623-582-0323 Fax 623-869-0675 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/signed text/plain (text body -- kept) application/x-pkcs7-signature --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
