Right, how do you win a "war on terror" when "terror", "terrorism" and "terrorist" have not be clearly defined. How do you determine who are terrorist and who are not. What uniform does the enemy wear, that we can declare war against them, and who is the general or commander with which we can negotiate a peace after the terror surrenders?
Terror has always been with us in one form or another, and it always will be with us. Terror should not be a military matter, but rather a police matter. Preemptive war is the wrong tool to use against terrorism; rather, the police should be used to investigate, discover, and identify terrorist to preempt terror plots before they can do us harm. Regards, LelandJ David Crooks wrote: > On Monday, April 30, 2007 5:55 PM Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > > <snipped> > > >> If the policing of terror, terrorist, and terrorism is war; what will >> > be next; "The war on illegal Drugs", The > >> War on Poverty", The War on Unwed Mother and others who do not abstain >> > form sex before marriage, The war on > >> illegal Aliens, etc, and is using our military the right tool for these >> > kind of social problems? > > I thought we already had these other wars and no one won?? > > David L. Crooks > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
