> I've been using Maxemail with the same good results. > It sure is nice to have options, yes? Things have certainly come a long way since my entry into the PC World (1984), and keep looking even better - despite the crap that comes into the forefront every once in a while.
Gil > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael Madigan > Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 2:25 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [NF] Fax machines > > > I've been using Maxemail with the same good results. > > > --- mrgmhale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have been using Send2FAX for over 1 year, despite > > having a perfectly good > > (older) FAX machine, and a perfectly good FAX Modem. > > What I like about it > > is I can be anywhere and have folks FAX documents to > > me, and they are stored > > on a Send2FAX Server that I can access via an IE or > > FireFox browser (others > > too I bet), and I can send any standard format > > document on disk as an > > outbound FAX (I have done jpg, pdf, doc, etc.) from > > any PC via a browser. I > > am also assigned a toll free # (USA and Canada > > only). I don't get junk > > FAXes, and if I do send anything out using either my > > FAX machine or FAX > > Modem I ID the sending FAX # as my Send2FAX number. > > The monthly fee is > > reasonable, and the per page fee is just as > > reasonable. I initially picked > > it up for both the remote access feature, and to > > free up my 2nd phone line > > in those cases where I had a conference call using > > both my lines and a FAX > > had to be sent to me. That pushed me over the edge. > > I never looked back. > > Incoming FAXes are reported to me via eMail. > > Outbound FAXes are reported as > > well, so I have a clean audit trail of who sent > > what, when, and the result > > (success/fail). Very nice service. > > > > Gil > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > > Pete Theisen > > > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 4:21 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [NF] Fax machines > > > > > > > > > On Thursday 05 July 2007 14:10, mrgmhale wrote: > > > > www.send2fax.com > > > > > > Hi Gil! > > > > > > You know, I remember something in Windows 95, > > awfax.exe or > > > something. Got a > > > cute little aplet icon on the desktop that you > > could fax computer > > > documents > > > over the phone. If you had a scanner you had a > > fax. > > > > > > I have never had a scanner that WORKED, though. > > Any number that didn't. > > > > > > > > I think a lot of people don't bother with it, > > they just demand > > > > > that you get a new fax. > > > > > > > > > > I don't know if my new one (Sharp UX-A255) can > > receive from the > > > > > old ones! So I am afraid to throw out the old > > one. Also, the old one > > > >>(Sharp UX-104) isn't as confusing. What to do, > > what to DO? > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > > > > Pete > > > http://www.pete-theisen.com/ > > > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
