On Jul 18, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Kevin Cully wrote:
> I see your point, and someday I may own a Mac ... but something just
> doesn't sit right. Do they have to restrict OS-X from running in
> virtual machines, as an example?
Apple is a hardware company. Period. The only reason OS X exists is
to encourage people to buy Apple hardware. Now think about your
question again.
> The REALbasic crowd is very concerned about applications breaking when
> Leopard comes out? Heck REAL Software jumped through hoops to
> optimize
> Mac applications for the new Intel based Macs. (I don't know much
> about
> Macs so I'm just observing from the side-lines and I don't know
> what all
> of this Leopard/Mach-0 business means.)
I'd have to know more to comment on what could possibly be breaking.
From all I've read, anything that is already Intel-compatible should
be fine.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
